Skip to main content
Marc Morris Anglo-Saxons

The Anglo-Saxons, Marc Morris

For his latest book, Marc Morris has gone grander and earlier than anything he's done before. The Anglo-Saxons: A History of the Beginnings of England covers the history of England from just before the fall of the Roman Empire through to the coming of the Normans 700 years later. Woven into the narrativeA story; in the writing of history it usually describes an approach that favours story over analysis.A story; in the writing of history it usually describes an approach that favours story over analysis. A story; in the writing of history it usually describes an approach that favours story over analysis. are the familiar tales of Hengist and Horsa, Gregory the Great’s ‘Angels’, viking raids and the Battle of Edington, along with the less well-known Æthelflæd, Lady of the Mercians, and the enterprising monks of Glastonbury. Coming in at slightly over 400 pages, The Anglo-Saxons thus attempts to provide the perfect detailed introduction to a period of epic proportions.

Despite the daunting nature of the undertaking, Morris completes it with aplomb. Annales-level in scope, the book tackles many of the social and cultural upheavals of the period, from the coming and going (and back again) of Christianity to changes in warfare, language, international relations and, importantly, the emergence of England as an identifiable, single ‘land’. Yet unlike the heavy thematic tomes of yesteryear, Morris approaches these changes chronologically, weaving them into a thoroughly absorbing story of derring-do, individual and national success and failure, and era-defining events. Bringing it all together are biographies of some of the outstanding characters of the period. Kings, bishops and dynasties walk the pages, not as footnotes but as drivers of the narrative, conveying to the reader times and ideas that might otherwise appear incomprehensible to a modern mindset.

This approach has its limits, which Morris freely admits. He is aware that much history has of necessity ended up on the cutting-room floor, and that content has sometimes been sacrificed to clarity. He therefore apologizes, for example, for the absence of detailed academic debates, acknowledging that any attempt ‘to summarize them is as foolhardy as trying to freeze a waterfall.’More infop. 7. Yet he also makes informed and well-argued judgements on many of those debates – the immigration or otherwise of the Germanic peoples at the end of the Roman era, the relationship between Alfred the Great of WessexAn Anglo-Saxon kingdom in the south of England, and a noble house. After Anglo-Saxon times, the term has been used to refer to the south west of England (excluding Cornwall).An Anglo-Saxon kingdom in the south of England, and a noble house. After Anglo-Saxon times, the term has been used to refer to the south west of England (excluding Cornwall).An Anglo-Saxon kingdom in the south of England, and a noble house. After Anglo-Saxon times, the term has been used to refer to the south west of England (excluding Cornwall). and Ceolwulf of Mercia, the effectiveness of Æthelred the Unready, to name but a few. The book, at least to a well-informed lay person, does not, then, lack in historiographyThe study of writing history, or of history that has already been written.The study of writing history, or of history that has already been written. The study of writing history, or of history that has already been written. . It is simply that it is so well integrated with the narrative that it often goes unnoticed. One does not need a sledgehammer to make a point.

Another apology is issued for the lack of women as focal points in chapters. This, obviously, is more down to a lack of evidence than to a lack of a strong women but Morris has managed to shoe-horn a range of under-represented characters in where possible. The want of documentary evidence is a problem with the era in general, when so little was written, and so little of what was written has survived. There are, of course, other sources of information, which Morris navigates well. He makes use of archaeological, architectural and scientific evidence, as well as folklore and saga literature, and many of these – finds from ships and burials, maps and aerial photography, pictures of Anglo-Saxon and Norman buildings – are illustrated within the text. The seven centuries between the Romans and the Normans were artistically rich and varied, and Morris proves this beautifully. Even so, some might suggest that there is too much weighting towards written evidence, but this is an ongoing argument between historians and archaeologists and will never be solved by any one man (or woman).

Naturally, the lack of evidence for what used to be known as the ‘Dark Ages’ has made the period a fertile ground for myth-making, and Morris makes it his job to dispel as many of these as possible. The notion of a golden age for women, of the formation of a particular constitutional path to freedom, the idea of the rights of all people being upheld and respected, even the habit of tenaciously holding out in times of adversity, have all been tracked to the Anglo-Saxon age. With the increase in interest in this period, aided by a huge number of films, television programmes and novels, many of these myths have been reinforced to the point where they’ve become fact in popular imagination. The Anglo-Saxons were Better. Morris’s answering point, well-argued and well-evidenced as always, comes across loud and clear: ‘We need to understand them, but we do not need to idolize them.’More infop. 7.

The Anglo-Saxons helps to make this possible. It brings a complicated and often occult period, covering an immense timescale and any number of upheavals, to life. It describes the people who lived through it in a sympathetic yet honest way, showing ‘their courage, their piety, their resourcefulness, their artistry, and their professed love of freedom’ but also ‘their brutality, their intolerance, their misogyny, and their reliance on the labour of slaves’, and it makes no attempt to sugar-coat it.More infop. 6. And Morris, with his exceptional skills as a writer and his in-depth historical knowledge, makes it a pleasure to read. As such, The Anglo-Saxons is an effective and accessible contribution to our understanding of what has become a very fashionable era.

Author Info

Debbie Kilroy

Having read history at the University of Birmingham as an undergraduate, where I won the Kenrick Prize, I worked as a trouble-shooter in the public sector until I took a career break in 2009. Thereafter, I was able to pursue my love of history and turn it into a career, founding Get History in 2014 with the aim of bringing accessible yet high quality history-telling and debate to a wide audience. Since then, I have completed a Masters in Historical Studies at the University of Oxford, from which I received a distinction and the Kellogg College Community Engagement and Impact Award. As well as continuing to write for and expand Get History, I am now a freelance writer and historian. I have worked with Histories of the Unexpected and Inside History, and my article for Parliaments, Estates and Representation won the ICHRPI Emile Lousse essay prize (2019).

Buy this book
The Anglo-Saxons, Marc Morris
The Anglo-Saxons, Marc Morris
8.5
out of 10

Factual Accuracy

9/10

Readability

10/10

Content

7/10

Analysis

8/10

Pros

  • +A history of epic proportions
  • +Strong narrative
  • +Excellent engagement with historical debates
  • +Good use of evidence
  • +Well-written, entertaining and accessible

Cons

  • -Can't include everything!
  • -Some might argue for greater concentration on non-documentary evidence
Buy this book